Looking up...
一个企业若重本轻末,只注重表面的包装而忽视产品质量,终将难以持久发展。
If a company prioritizes form over substance, focusing only on superficial packaging while neglecting product quality, it will struggle to develop sustainably.
To prioritize fundamental or essential aspects over superficial or secondary ones, often leading to misplaced focus on appearances or trivial matters.
古代思想家认为治国者应重本轻末,重视农业生产而非奢侈品消费。
Ancient thinkers believed rulers should prioritize substance over form, emphasizing agricultural production over luxury consumption.
现代教育若重本轻末,只追求文凭而忽视实际能力培养,将无法适应社会需求。
If modern education prioritizes form over substance, chasing diplomas while neglecting practical skill development, it will fail to meet societal needs.
Commonly used in discussions about resource allocation, policy-making, or personal values where the core purpose is overshadowed by superficial concerns.
Do not confuse this idiom with '本末倒置' (inverting priorities). '重本轻末' implies neglecting the essential due to overemphasis on the trivial, while '本末倒置' suggests an outright reversal of what should come first.
Use this idiom when discussing systemic failures caused by misplaced focus, such as a company prioritizing marketing over product quality, or a government emphasizing GDP growth over social welfare.
Originates from classical Chinese philosophy, first appearing in texts like the 'Han Feizi' (韩非子) during the Warring States period (~475–221 BCE). The idiom reflects Confucian and Daoist ideals of focusing on foundational values (本, 'root') while avoiding excessive attention to secondary matters (末, 'twigs').
Often used critically to describe misguided priorities, such as valuing appearances over functionality, or short-term gains over long-term sustainability. The opposite concept is '正本清源' (clearing the source to purify the stream), which advocates addressing root causes.